MANILA, Philippines – Sen. Panfilo Lacson on Saturday warned that senators, along with members of the House of Representatives, may be complicit in the ongoing controversy involving anomalous and ghost flood control projects, reiterating his call for complete transparency in the national budgeting process.
Lacson said on radio that lawmakers from both chambers routinely propose budget amendments or "insertions"—a practice that, while technically legal, can be exploited to channel funds into questionable infrastructure projects.
“I’m not saying it’s only House members,” Lacson said in Filipino. “It’s possible that some senators have inserted funding for such projects and even profited from the 25 percent share typically given to the ‘funder’ or proponent.”
Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal

Pressed further on whether senators might be tied to these fraudulent schemes, the senator replied, “There may be senators and House members who are connected to anomalous flood control projects.”
Lacson, a long-time advocate for budget transparency, refrained from naming specific individuals, stressing the importance of solid evidence. “It’s not right to name names without proof,” he said. “In my case, I only make findings public once they are backed by factual and verifiable information.”
Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal, This news data comes from:http://redcanaco.com
- Comelec: Postponed village, youth elections not in 2026 budget
- Israel military says controls 40 percent of Gaza City
- Suspect in 2012 killing of Dutch aid worker freed
- Marcos orders 'sweeping review' of DPWH budget under 2026 NEP
- MMDA proposes rainwater facilities in Camp Aguinaldo to mitigate EDSA flooding
- Private groups back DHSUD chief's anti-corruption policy
- Discaya says her family owns nine companies
- Pasig fire kills child, injures mother as she tries to save him
- Motive probed for US church shooting that killed 2 children, injured 17
- SC orders comment on petitions vs polls